Talk:Mustafa Letter

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Personal thoughts on the Mostapha letters

JJhashisreasons (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC) - I know my signature is unconventional, but here goes. There are two Mostafa letters in the Wikipedia 'book', and I would give them the iCup (a joke where the victim has to spell out I C U P, which is homophonous to I See You Pee because if I got a Mostafa/Mohamed/Qadafi letter I would forward it to law enforcement as race hate. I'm indifferent to religion but Islamophobia isn't just Islamophobia. It's also what I call Islamofraternophobia (the hatred of fraternising with Muslims, or those who do), and Islamofraternofraterno.....phobia, recursively.[reply]

References

I see no way of verifying the references. None can be found online. Can someone find a reference? One in Norwegian will do. Jason from nyc (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one from TV2 (a section from a longer article about the history of Frp): "Fremskrittspartiet var i mange år et parti med liten oppslutning, men ved lokalvalget i 1987 endret dette seg. Carl I. Hagen mottok det berømte «Mustafa-brevet» som skulle ha vært skrevet av en muslimsk innvandrer. En rystet Hagen leste høyt fra brevet som beskrev hvordan Norge skulle omdannes til en muslimsk stat, der kirkene skulle erstattes av moskeer. Brevet viste seg senere å være falskt, men innvandring var blitt en av Fremskrittspartiets viktigste saker." Iselilja (talk) 19:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's helpful. It also shows the significance of the fraudulent letter. Jason from nyc (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible POV

The article was leaving out important pieces of information mentioned in the sources. Added them for clarification. If anyone wants to contest the changes, let's use this thread to discuss the content.

--Arsaces (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]